Key Takeaways:

– “Beetlejuice Beetlejuice” is set to hit the theaters next week, 36 years after the original.
– Initial reactions to the sequel have been very positive.
– Director Tim Burton doesn’t anticipate a third sequel.
– The basis for the sequel rooted in Winona Ryder’s character, Lydia.
– Producers echo Burton’s sentiments, saying they focused on creating one excellent movie.
– Box office performance will ultimately decide the possibility of a sequel.
– Film expected to open with solid box office income ranging between $65-$80 million.

Fan or not, you’ve heard about it—the much-awaited sequel “Beetlejuice Beetlejuice” is finally hitting the screens next week. That’s right! 36 years after the first movie, we get to enjoy the ghoulish, hilarious world of Beetlejuice once again. At-home horror fans and chill-chasers alike are already abuzz with excitement, especially since early reviews hint it’s a real thrill-ride.

Hoping for a “Beetlejuice 3”? Don’t Hold Your Breath

As much as we’d all love a third slice of the Beetlejuice pie, it would be wise not to expect it. Speaking at the London premiere, iconic director Tim Burton threw some cold water on these hopes. He joked that considering how long it took to make the sequel, he’d be around 100 years old by the time the third instalment could be ready. So, while it isn’t set in stone, it seems rather unlikely.

The Genesis of “Beetlejuice Beetlejuice”

Ever wondered why it took such an eternity for Beetlejuice to return? Well, it seems we can thank Winona Ryder’s character, Lydia, for that. In an interview, Burton explained that Lydia’s evolution as a character intrigued him. The process of her ageing and the relatable real-life situations that come with it sparked his interest and felt more fitting to be made now. Lydia’s novel exploration of relationships, maybe having kids, and the changes we go through as we age formed the backbone of the sequel’s story.

Not Counting Chickens Just Yet

While most of us are already gearing up for another sequel post “Beetlejuice Beetlejuice”, producer Tommy Harper kept his feet firmly on the ground. He mentioned that the focus was more on making a phenomenal second movie than planning far into the future. Now that’s something to appreciate, right? They’re concentrated on delivering something awesome right now and leaving the future open to possibilities.

Box Office Impact

When we talk about possible sequels, we can’t overlook the importance of the box office. The response at the counter can define the future of the franchise. “Beetlejuice Beetlejuice” is projected to do wonders, with anticipated earnings somewhere between $65 and $80 million—a powerful opening!

First Impressions

If you’ve been questioning the authenticity of the sequel, here’s some relief. Eric Walkuski, an esteemed reviewer, found the movie to be much more than just a blast from the past. He admired the returning cast, especially Catherine O’Hara, who stole the show as Delia. Walkuski also highlighted Beetlejuice Beetlejuice’s ability to surprise with some fresh, unique tricks and its blend of new and nostalgic elements.

Synopsis of “Beetlejuice Beetlejuice”

The official plot for the sequel confirms our worst fears—the mischievous demon Beetlejuice is back! The sequel sees Lydia’s kin encounter some unexpected family drama. When Astrid, Lydia’s rebellious teen daughter, stumbles upon a strange town model in the attic, she unintentionally opens the portal to the Afterlife. Both the living and dead realms face looming chaos, making Beetlejuice’s comeback a ticking time bomb.

So be prepared to hit the theaters on September 6th. Get ready, folks, Beetlejuice is about to strike again!

Key Takeaways:

– Hayden Panettiere is the latest addition to the upcoming film, “A Breed Apart”, a remake of the Wes Craven-produced 2006 killer dog movie, “The Breed”.
– Nathan and Griff Furst, known for directing killer animal films, are directing and producing this thriller.
– The film follows a group on a mission to search abandoned dogs on an island, turning into a survival battle against vicious dogs.
– The fresh cast includes Grace Caroline Currey, Virginia Gardner, Page Kennedy, Joey Bragg, Troy Gentile, and Riele Downs.

Are you ready for some thrilling adventure? Because Hayden Panettiere has hopped on board for an exciting ride! She’s joining the cast of “A Breed Apart”, a remake of a 2006 movie titled “The Breed”. If you love suspenseful dramas with a dash of horror, this is for you!

Remember Wes Craven? The genius mind behind epic horror movies like “The Nightmare on Elm Street” and “Scream”, produced “The Breed” in 2006. Director Nicholas Mastandrea gave life to the killer dog movie, which became quite a hit. Now, get ready to experience an unconventional reimagining of this daring flick.

This new movie, “A Breed Apart”, will be directed and produced by none other than the Furst Brothers – Nathan and Griff. If their names ring a bell, you’re right on target. They’re pros when it comes to directing nail-biting animal movies. Remember “Trailer Park Shark”, “Ghost Shark”, and “Nightmare Shark”? Yep, all their work!

The plot of “A Breed Apart” is just as exciting as the original. Picture this: a diverse group embarks on a journey to find abandoned dogs on a remote island. But their expedition quickly turns into a nightmare of survival against a vicious pack of dogs. This survival epic isn’t just a remake; it’s a sort of sequel, set after the events of “The Breed”.

Here’s a twist: the story kickstarts when a pack of dogs escapes from a movie set on a remote island. Fast forward a few years, a bunch of YouTubers find themselves drawn to this island. Their mission? To locate the dog pack and make their journey go viral. But their reality quickly transforms into a fight for survival.

Panettiere isn’t the only one bringing this brilliant story to life. She’s joined by Grace Caroline Currey and Virginia Gardner, who you might remember from “Fall”. Page Kennedy, the star of “The Meg”, is also part of this promising ensemble. Also, look out for Joey Bragg from “Liv and Maddie”, Troy Gentile of “The Goldbergs”, and Riele Downs from “Henry Danger”. These talented actors are sure to make the film entertaining and jaw-dropping.

For those who haven’t watched “The Breed” (2006), here’s a quick recap: Brothers Matt and John went to an exotic island seeking a fun week. But when one was attacked by a dog, their trip quickly spiraled into a horror story. An escape attempt went south when they found their sea plane disabled by dogs, leading to a desperate struggle for survival.

All in all, “A Breed Apart” seems like a thrilling ride, especially with Hayden Panettiere’s fresh addition. If you’re a fan of suspense, adventure, and (just a hint of) horror, this is something you won’t want to miss! Let’s eagerly wait for this promising flick to hit our screens soon.

Key Takeaways:

– Despite being nearly a 30-year-old franchise, the Bad Boys series has only produced four movies.
– Will Smith’s rise to fame has made the sporadic return of the franchise a welcome event.
– The Bad Boys movies continue to entertain despite changes in directorship.
– This article aims to rank these movies from worst to best.

The Bad Boys franchise has been on our screens for almost three decades but surprisingly, we have only seen four movies from this series. Headlining big stars like Will Smith and Martin Lawrence, the action-packed thrillers, despite their occasional release, have managed to keep fans entertained and in anticipation of what’s next. Following is a ranking, starting from the worst to the best, of the four Bad Boys movies we’ve had so far.

“Bad Boys For Life” (2020)

Of all the four, my least favorite, surprisingly, is “Bad Boys For Life” which was released in 2020. A surprise not less because Michael Bay, who had been instrumental to the making of the franchise, left it, which affected the action quality. The new directors, Adil El Arbi and Bilall Fallah, directed the focus majorly to introducing a team (AMMO), making the movie look similar to the Fast and Furious franchise.

“Bad Boys: Ride or Die” (2024)

Next up is “Bad Boys: Ride or Die”, the latest film in the franchise. Here, directors Adil and Bilall improved their game, making sure to bring the spotlight back to Will Smith and Martin Lawrence’s characters, Mike and Marcus. The buddy cop feature, which was a popular attribute of the franchise, was again strengthened, and this was received well by the audience. The focus was much more on the main characters since the AMMO team had been established in the previous film.

“Bad Boys” (1995)

Stepping up on the rank, the originator of the franchise, “Bad Boys”, which was released back in 1995, has a special place in my heart. It made both Will Smith and Martin Lawrence bigger stars and transformed a simple action movie concept into a long-lasting franchise. Michael Bay’s mastery in the execution and pacing of action scenes also played an indispensable role in making this movie a huge hit.

“Bad Boys 2” (2003)

Topping the list is “Bad Boys 2”, which premiered in 2003. Even though it received mixed reviews due to its excess violence and chaotic plot, I personally love it for what it is — a wild, thrilling, fast-paced ride. From an extreme shoot-out opening scene with the KKK to a war movie ending that seems borrowed from Black Hawk Down, this sequel takes you on a roller coaster journey of excitement and adventure.

Although it was only a modest financial success when it first released, “Bad Boys 2” remains one of the most enjoyable and memorable entries of the franchise. Its unusual and intense plot twists keep the audience hooked, and despite the violent portrayals, the roguish charm of Will Smith and Martin Lawrence keeps us rooting for more.

All in all, it’s clear that every entry in the Bad Boys franchise has its unique flavor and charm. Whether it’s the classic thrills of the Bay-directed films or the new direction taken by Arbi and Fallah, there’s something in these movies for every action lover. But remember, this is only one perspective — which movie ruled your heart? Let us know in the comments!

Key Takeaways:
– Tom Ortenberg’s Briarcliff Entertainment acquires the film, ‘The Apprentice’, which is based on Donald Trump’s rise in real estate.
– The film is planned for release on October 11, ahead of the US Presidential Election.
– Sebastian Stan, known for his work in ‘Thunderbolts’, was roped in to play Trump.
– Jeremy Strong of ‘Succession’ will portray Roy Cohn, Trump’s former advisor.
– It’s reported that the film will receive a full-on awards campaign.

Now, let’s get into the full details, folks!

Greetings, movie buffs! Isn’t it exciting to see real-world stories on the big screen? Well, we have an interesting tidbit about a new movie that you might want to keep on your radar.

That’s right! We’re talking about the upcoming film ‘The Apprentice’ which chronicles the rise of Donald Trump in the real estate world.

What’s the Buzz About?

The Hollywood Reporter recently let us in on an important development. ‘The Apprentice’, directed by Ali Abbasi, has been snagged by Tom Ortenberg’s Briarcliff Entertainment. They’ve got big plans for this one, guys! You can start marking your calendars because the film is slated for release on October 11. That’s just weeks before the U.S. Presidential Election.

A Star-Studded Affair

This isn’t your average biopic, either. The cast is impressive! Playing Trump himself is none other than ‘Thunderbolts’ star, Sebastian Stan. Ever wondered who’d look good in that famous Trump hair? Well, Stan is about to give us a taste!

Not only that, but we also have Jeremy Strong on board. You might remember him from ‘Succession’. He’ll be stepping into the shoes of Roy Cohn, who was somewhat of a right-hand man to Trump back then.

Adding to the glittery cast is Maria Bakalova, known for her roles in ‘Borat 2’ and ‘Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 3’. She’s set to play Ivana Trump.

Looking Back at Trump’s Rise

The film will let us peek into Trump’s life from his twenties to his late thirties. It’ll take us through his milestones and struggles as he built his real estate empire in the ’70s and ’80s. We’ll also get to see the dynamics of his relationship with the controversial attorney, Roy Cohn.

According to the film teasers, it aims to unravel the world of power, ambition, corruption, and deceit. It illustrates the mentor-protégé relationship that shaped Trump’s destiny and gave birth to an American dynasty.

Behind the Scenes

Credit for the film’s sharp narrative goes to Gabriel Sherman, who’s known for his in-depth chronicling of Trump for Vanity Fair. And guess what? His book ‘The Loudest Voice in the Room’ inspired an entire Showtime series! Talk about being influential in storytelling.

A Fine Reception

The film has already piqued the interest of critics. It was revealed at Cannes and has scored a pretty decent 77% on Rotten Tomatoes. Can you believe that?!

As if that wasn’t enough, it’s also being teased for screening at some cool film festivals this fall. Top that off with rumours of a full-on awards campaign planned by Ortenberg. We might be looking at another ‘Crash’ or ‘Spotlight’ here, folks.

That’s it for now, movie lovers! We can’t wait to see how this film turns out. Be sure to keep your popcorn ready for ‘The Apprentice’ releasing on October 11.

Key Takeaways:

– Wolf Creek 3, to be known as Wolf Creek: Legacy, will begin filming in Australia in early 2025.
– Sean Lahiff has replaced Rachele Wiggins as the director for the sequel.
– The script, penned by Duncan Samarasinghe, still follows the story of an American family hunted by Mick Taylor in the Australian Outback.
– Jay Ryan, famed from IT: Chapter Two, will also join the cast alongside John Jarratt.

Get ready, horror fans! Your favorite Australian serial killer Mick Taylor, brought to life by John Jarratt, is set to return with new victims to torment in the upcoming sequel to Wolf Creek. The new installment, titled Wolf Creek: Legacy, is finally on track to start shooting in Australia in 2025. You might remember Jarratt from the original films Wolf Creek and Wolf Creek 2, and also in two series of the spin-off television series.

Film and New Director Details

If you’ve been following the production, you’re aware there have been few hurdles. Initially slated to be directed by Rachele Wiggins, the project encountered delays, causing Wiggins to step down. However, it’s not all bad news! Sean Lahiff, esteemed editor of Wolf Creek 2, has taken the reins as director, and he’s bringing fresh ideas and vision to the project.

Creator and producer Greg McLean expressed his excitement over the new director. He applauds Lahiff’s vast knowledge and experience in the Wolf Creek universe and expects the sequel to take a bold step into uncharted territory while retaining the beloved elements of the franchise.

Sharing McLean’s enthusiasm, Lahiff is looking forward to delivering the expected horror and suspense that fans of Wolf Creek crave. He aims to delve deeper into the psychological aspect of horror, exploring new levels of terror and resilience of the characters. The planned storytelling style will not only keep viewers on edge but also tap into primal fears.

Plot Overview

What can we expect from the plot, you ask? The new film, written by Duncan Samarasinghe, continues the saga of Mick Taylor. This time, his victims are an innocent family of American tourists visiting the Australian Outback. The narrative follows the harrowing ordeal of the two children who narrowly escape being preyed upon by Australia’s infamous killer, leading to an intense and chilling game of cat and mouse.

New Faces in the Cast

Joining Jarratt in this harrowing journey is Jay Ryan, known for his role in “IT: Chapter Two.” This cast addition brings an exciting element to the well-anticipated project. The producers of the film, alongside McLean, are Jeremy Bolt, Kristian Moliere, and Bianca Martino, with Cory Todd Hughes and Adrian Speckert serving as executive producers.

Company Architect will handle world sales of the project. They expressed their thrill to reintroduce the terrifying Mick Taylor character to a new generation of horror enthusiasts, noting that the original Wolf Creek transformed audience perceptions of horror.

In Conclusion

Wolf Creek: Legacy promises an exciting return to a well-admired horror franchise, with fresh narrative elements and a new director eager to unleash the tense fear intrinsic to Wolf Creek. Whether you’re a die-hard fan of the series or a general admirer of the horror genre, this sequel aims to serve an emotional and thrilling rollercoaster leaving you on the edge of your seat. So, are you ready for a new bout of terror with Mick Taylor? We’d love to hear your thoughts!

Key Takeaways:
– The 1997 episode of ‘WTF Happened to This Horror Movie?’ discussed ‘Spawn,’ a movie based on Todd McFarlane’s adult-themed comic.
– Despite criticisms, the ‘Spawn’ movie broke barriers and earned commercial success, but also faced issues with its PG-13 rating limiting the dark, adult themes from the original comic series.
– Jason Blum recently shared a picture of the new ‘Spawn’ script titled ‘King Spawn,’ hinting a revival could be in the works.

For today’s discussion, we’re taking a trip down memory lane and revisiting 1997’s ‘Spawn’- a horror film that sparked more than just controversies. Produced by Andrew Hatfield and John Fallon, the episode about ‘Spawn’ on ‘WTF Happened to This Horror Movie?’ offered insights into what exactly went down during the making of the movie.

‘Spawn’ was derived from Todd McFarlane’s comic series, heralded for its mature content and dark themes. Yes, it featured a superhero, but a unique one – hailing from hell and surrounded by equally demonic characters.

Witnessing the commercial vitality of the ‘Spawn’ comics, which sold a record-breaking 1.7 million copies when initially released, a movie adaptation was inevitable. However, transferring the gritty material into a PG-13 film for mainstream audiences was a challenge.

When Columbia Pictures showed interest in a film but were reluctant to give McFarlane creative control, he sold the rights to New Line Cinema. The stipulation being, the movie had to be tamed down to a PG-13 version, displaying an odd juxtaposition between Spawn’s originally explicit and mature persona against the softer family-friendly mold Hollywood wanted.

The major highlight from ‘Spawn’s’ filming was its significant emphasis on special effects, bumping the estimated $20 million budget to $40 million. Mark Dippe, who had experience working in special effects, was made the director. Though the outcome often gets a bad rap for its rushed graphics, there were some outstanding effects such as the Violator transformation.

Writing a PG-13 version of ‘Spawn’ was not a walk in the park. Thankfully, Halloween 4 writer Alan McElroy was up for the task. He had even collaborated with McFarlane on multiple Spawn comic books and the animated series.

Martial artist and actor Michael Jai White was selected to play the titular character, Al Simmons, better known as ‘Spawn’. A variety of well-known actors, including Wesley Snipes and Samuel L. Jackson, were initially considered for the role.

‘Spawn,’ despite its hard-to-swallow nature for conservative audiences, performed relatively well financially. It made back more than double its $40 million budget, though it wasn’t as well received by critics, with a 17% rating on Rotten Tomatoes.

Looking ahead, there might be another chapter in the ‘Spawn’ saga. Recently, a photo of a new ‘Spawn’ script titled ‘King Spawn’ was tweeted by Blumhouse CEO Jason Blum, which indicates a possible reboot. Should that happen, fans might finally see a version that stays true to McFarlane’s original dark vision.

In the end, ‘Spawn,’ despite its criticisms, has left an indelible mark on the history of comic-based cinema, boldly introducing mature, darker themes in the predominantly clean superhero movie landscape. While it’s unclear how the possible reboot might fare among critics and audiences, one thing’s for sure: ‘Spawn’ was a game-changer, and we can’t wait to see what more is coming.

Key Takeaways:
– Cave Blanchett shines in her role as Catherine Ravenscroft, a journalist caught up in a chilling tale in Alfonso Cuaron’s new series Disclaimer.
– Alfonso Cuaron delivers a stunning directorial output, tackling complex themes of grief, secrets and revenge.
– The series challenges audiences to confront their biases and make difficult judgments about the characters’ actions.
– With exceptional performances from the cast, Disclaimer is set to become the talk of the year.
– The series is premiering globally on Apple TV+ on October 11th.

Renowned director Alfonso Cuaron explores the depth of human nature, grief and revenge in his latest TV series, Disclaimer. The seven-chapter series revolves around the celebrated journalist, Catherine Ravenscroft, portrayed by the illustrious Cate Blanchett. A mysterious novel exposing Catherine’s deepest secrets turns her life upside down, pushing her into a race against time to uncover the author’s identity. From her relationship with her husband Robert (played by Sacha Baron Cohen) to her son Nicholas (played by Kodi Smit-McPhee), no stone of her life remains unturned.

From the moment the novel surfaces, Catherine’s life starts unraveling fast. With each chapter, viewers witness how secrets can shatter the closest of relationships. The thrilling narrative weaves in the perspectives of other characters, including Catherine’s husband Robert and the family of retired teacher Stephen Brigstocke (Kevin Kline). Just like Catherine, both of these families bear the heavy consequences of the novel’s release.

Interestingly, Cuaron chooses to take viewers on a roller-coaster ride with their judgments of the characters. By the end of the series, your feelings towards each character might be vastly different from what it was in the beginning.

Kevin Kline steals the show with his performance as the haunted and vengeful Stephen. Cate Blanchett, as expected, delivers a captivating portrayal of a woman under societal judgement. Sacha Baron Cohen, Kodi Smit-McPhee and Louis Partridge all put on commendable performances, contributing to the overall excellence of the series.

In true Alfonso Cuaron style, the series includes elements from his previous directorial successes. Combining the sexual tension evident in “Y Tu Mama Tambien”, the storytelling from “Great Expectations”, visuals of “Roma”, technical expertise from “Gravity”, and emotional weight from “Children of Men”, Cuaron creates an unforgettable cinematic experience.

Incorporating the meticulous camera work of cinematographers Emmanuel Lubezki and Bruno Delbonnel, and a haunting score from Finneas O’Connell, Disclaimer turns out to be a highly engaging series. Despite its hefty running time of around seven hours, the series keeps the audience hooked throughout.

Disclaimer brings to the fore the damaging power of assumptions and the profound impact of perspective. It challenges viewers to confront their biases and make their own judgments about the characters’ actions. The series takes the audience on a heartbreaking emotional rollercoaster that leaves them reflecting on their own perceptions.

To put it simply, if Disclaimer were a feature film, it would undoubtedly be touted for hefty laurels. As it stands, it’s set to become not just the best series of the year but one of the finest examples of emotional storytelling in television history.

Take a deep breath and roll the dice, because Disclaimer is set to blow your mind on October 11th, exclusively on AppleTV+! You certainly wouldn’t want to miss this roller coaster, would you?