Key Takeaways:

– Roland Emmerich, writer/director of Stargate, shows no interest in returning to the franchise.
– He cited the complications related to Stargate’s intellectual property rights as the main reason.
– Amazon is keen on reviving the Stargate franchise, now that they own MGM.

Let’s start off by taking a trip down memory lane. Picture it: 1994, a year when flannel shirts were in style and the internet was just stepping into the spotlight. During this fine year, Roland Emmerich and Dean Devlin unleashed a science fiction gem on the world – Stargate.

The massively popular film created a buzz, leading to TV shows, books, comic books, video games, and direct-to-video features, expanding the franchise by leaps and bounds. Fans were hooked! They kept demanding more storming through the “Stargate” and the series Stargate SG-1 became a fan favorite.

Now, it’s been a few years since we’ve seen any fresh Stargate material and frankly, fans have been feeling the drought. Way back in 2014, Arnold Emmerich and Dean Devlin toyed with the idea of rebooting the franchise, planning a new trilogy. But even after working on the plan for a couple of years, things didn’t go as planned.

Fast-forward to 2021, we found out something exciting. Amazon, which now owns MGM, the home of Stargate, is interested in reviving the franchise! But don’t hold your breath waiting for Roland Emmerich’s involvement.

While attending the San Diego Comic-Con, JoBlo’s Chris Bumbray got an opportunity to speak with Emmerich directly about the future of Stargate. Despite Bumbray’s hopes that Emmerich could potentially lead a new Stargate series, Emmerich responded that it’s not a straightforward process. The intellectual property rights of Stargate are divided among different entities, complicating things further. In his words, he doesn’t want to deal with such complications, basically saying “I’ve had enough!”

Recalling the original Stargate plot, you’d remember Dr. Daniel Jackson and retired Army Col. Jack O’Neil, who ventured through an interstellar gateway to an Egyptian-styled world. They landed on a planet with a tyrannical ruler, Ra, holding the key to their return to Earth. How they convince the planet’s inhabitants to overthrow Ra became the central plot of the story. The movie starred big names like Kurt Russell, James Spader, Jaye Davidson, Viveca Lindfors, and Alexis Cruz, among others.

So, what do you think about the prospect of a Stargate revival? Given everything we’ve discussed, would you still want Roland Emmerich to return? Leave a comment below and join the discussion!

Remember, the Stargate may lead to a universe wide and unimaginable, but every now and then, it’s fun to share your thoughts with fellow earthlings, too! Or as they say in the franchise, Jaffa kree!

Key Takeaways:

– The Naruto live-action movie by Lionsgate is facing criticism and skepticism due to reports of uncertainty and lack of knowledge among the producers.
– Masashi Kishimoto, creator of Naruto, has signed off on the project but isn’t involved in the production, intensifying fans’ concerns.
– Similarities have been drawn between the rumored state of this project and the failed Dragonball Evolution adaptation, further decreasing fans’ expectations.
– Despite the success of One Piece live-action series, Naruto’s adaptation might not follow the same success trail.

Baffling Uncertainty Surrounding the Naruto Live-Action Movie

One of the most loved series, Naruto, is expected to have a live-action film version courtesy of Lionsgate. This news has been in the air since 2015, with fans eagerly awaiting more updates. The recent uncertainty and anticipated disaster surrounding the project, however, have left fans an edge. What’s more, the seeming lack of understanding of the storyline by the producers has fans worried.

Disappointments and Struggles with Live-Action Adaptations

Refashioning animated series into live-action flicks often leads to disappointment, as they fail to meet the high expectations of fans. However, the upbeat success of the One Piece live-action series by Netflix has given fans hope for the Naruto adaptation. According to recent reports, though, the producers seem to be lost about the plot and characters, adding to the anxiety of the fans.

Plausible Failure of the Naruto Live-Action Movie

Matt McGloin from Cosmic Book News cited inside information that the Naruto live-action movie producers don’t fully grasp the story or characters of the anime and manga series. This situation, unsettlingly similar to the critically panned Dragonball Evolution, suggests that they might be capitalizing on the existing fan base, rather than having respect for the source material or the fans’ sentiments.

Masashi Kishimoto’s Absence from the Live-Action Project

Compounding concerns is the fact that Masashi Kishimoto, creator of Naruto, isn’t actively involved in the film’s development, although he has given his okay for it. Fans have expressed fears that this absence might negatively affect the film’s success, considering the input Eiichiro Oda, creator of One Piece, had in the success of its live-action series.

Kishimoto distancing himself from the Naruto live-action, in conjunction with the producers’ reported ignorance of the story, cast a long shadow over the film’s prospects. Lionsgate’s reluctance to provide solid updates regarding the project only adds to the skepticism, making some fans wary whether Naruto will follow in the footprints of One Piece’s live-action success.

The Path Ahead for Lionsgate and Naruto Live-Action Movie

For the Naruto live-action movie to attain the similar success as One Piece, Lionsgate needs to double down and rectify the apparent lack of knowledge about the anime narrative and characters, hopefully learning from the example set by One Piece. Until then, the fans of Naruto are left stranded with concerns about the film and hopes of their favorite ninjas done justice on screen.

For now, fans can stream Naruto on Hulu, rewatching and revisiting epic fights, heart-wrenching moments, and comedic reliefs in the beloved ninja world. And while they do, the anticipation continues for a Naruto live-action movie that matches the original series in quality and narrative.

Key Takeaways:

– “The Big Bang Theory” actor, Mayim Bialik, received less pay than her male co-stars.
– Bob Newhart, who played Professor Proton on the show, made a significant contribution before his recent demise.
– The original five cast members of the show received a substantial raise for the final season.

The world of sitcoms has been graced by numerous classics, among which “The Big Bang Theory” stands supreme. Alongside industry behemoths like “FRIENDS” and “How I Met Your Mother”, “The Big Bang Theory”, headlined by Jim Parsons, continues to charm new and old viewers alike. Parsons shared the limelight with Johnny Galecki and Kaley Cuoco from the outset, forming the crux of the show.

The Ensemble Cast’s Pay Disparity

Early seasons of the show saw the rise of supporting actors Kunal Nayyar, Simon Helberg, Melissa Rauch, and Mayim Bialik. However, despite growing popularity, a significant pay gap persisted, particularly affecting Bialik in comparison to the male supporting actors.

Bialik joined the ensemble in the closing of the show’s third season. By this time, Parsons, Galecki, Cuoco, Nayyar, and Helberg had become household names, each commanding hefty paychecks. For instance, each of the first three was earning a whopping $1 million per episode while Nayyar and Helberg were making $765,000 apiece.

However, Bialik, who only appeared in the final episode of season 3, received a paycheck of just $378,602. She did see a pay raise in subsequent seasons, bumping her earnings to half a million for season 4 and eventually $5 million for season 5. Interestingly, this was still lesser than Nayyar and Helberg who were each raking in $6 million for the same season.

In the final season, the original five cast members made a colossal $1 million per episode. They even forfeited $100,000 per episode to increase Bialik and Rauch’s earnings. Nevertheless, Bialik still reportedly earned less per episode – around $425,000 in contrast to Nayyar and Helberg’s million-dollar mark.

Remembering Bob Newhart’s Impact

On a different note, the show’s universe was greatly enriched by legendary actor Bob Newhart who played Arthur Jeffries, also known as Professor Proton. Newhart recently passed away, prompting a heartfelt tribute from the show’s co-creator, Chuck Lorre.

Lorre reminisced about Newhart’s contributions to the show, acknowledging how he had always dreamt of having him on board. Finally, under the condition that his character would have an arc spanning several episodes and that he would win an Emmy, Newhart accepted the role.

Newhart’s wishes were fulfilled as he bagged the Emmy for Outstanding Guest Actor in a Comedy Series for his portrayal of Professor Proton. His contribution to the series, along with his distinguished track record in film, will live on in memory, imprinting him as a comedy legend.

In sum, “The Big Bang Theory” was an amalgamation of talented artists and unforgettable performances. While the pay disparity issue cast a shadow on the show’s legacy, the contribution of someone like Newhart certainly brought a touch of grace and nostalgia to the beloved sitcom. Watch “The Big Bang Theory” for yourself on Max, and relive the laughter and charm that captivated millions.

Key Takeaways:
– Fans are fervently anticipating the second season of “The Last of Us”.
– The release of the first teaser increased both excitement and apprehension among fans.
– The casting of Kaitlyn Dever as Abby Anderson has particularly worried the audience.
– Fans express their concern about the negative public image that Dever might attract due to her character’s actions.
– The audience remains hopeful that the show will avoid replicating the controversial actions of Abby’s character in the game.

The announcement for the second season of “The Last of Us” has sparked anticipation and anxiety among fans. The release of the first teaser showcased a sneak peek into the next season, leaving fans eager yet fearful. A central figure of their apprehension is the announcement of Kaitlyn Dever’s casting as Abby Anderson, a character whose actions in the game version have left a controversial impact.

The Fear for Abby Anderson

The character of Abby Anderson in “The Last of Us Part II” game is responsible for one of the most pivotal and complex arcs in the narrative. Abby is the character who kills Joel, a protagonist, a move that sparked heated debates among the fans. The actions of her character and their impact on Ellie’s, another leading character, propelled a division among the game’s fanbase.

The Controversy that Split the Fanbase

The fans’ opinions on Abby’s character in the game were polar opposite, some thought it beautifully orchestrated, while others loathed its execution. The reaction has made Abby one of the most disliked figures in the game. As Kaitlyn Dever prepares to step into this role, she could be met with the same controversial treatment the character garnered in the game.

Kaitlyn Dever as Abby: The Discussion

The unveiling of the much-anticipated teaser featured Kaitlyn Dever as Abby Anderson. Ironically, fans were not discussing her appearance or her potential performance; instead, they expressed an entirely different concern. The majority of the fan discourse revolved around the potential actions of Abby, leading to worries about Kaitlyn Dever’s public image.

A Plethora of Concern for Kaitlyn Dever

Given Abby’s much-disliked actions in the game, fans are concerned that Dever might face backlash when her character inevitably mirrors the same actions on the series, more specifically, killing Joel Miller, played by Pedro Pascal. The brutal method of Joel’s death at Abby’s hands, using a golf club, has been seared into the collective memory of the game’s audience. Fans are ardently pleading with the show’s makers to spare Abby–and Dever–this controversial plotline.

Trying to Shield Kaitlyn Dever from Bitterness

The apprehension about future events in the show has led fans to provide unsolicited advice, hoping to buffer Kaitlyn Dever against any hate she might face due to her character’s inevitable choice. A testament to their loyalty to the show, their concern for Dever’s public image is palpable even though the controversial occurrence is unavoidable.

In conclusion, the arising fear and anxiety amidst fans for the second season of “The Last of Us” barely conceals their underlying excitement. The anticipation floats around Kaitlyn Dever’s impending portrayal of Abby’s character, leaving fans on the edge of their seats. It’s a testament to the series’ gripping narrative and unforgettable characters, leaving us eager for the rollercoaster ride that the second season promises to be.

Key Takeaways:

– Monica Geller from ‘FRIENDS’ is recognized for her numerous character quirks.
– Fans have started exploring the origins of her extremely competitive nature.
– Her competitive spirit may have roots in her childhood experiences with her family.

Discovering Monica Geller’s Competitive Nature in ‘FRIENDS’

While ‘FRIENDS’ is known for its comedic portrayal of serious issues, it’s no ordinary sitcom. Beneath the humor, the characters’ complex personalities and experiences serve as crucial elements in the storyline. These characters develop over time, revealing depths that might not be initially apparent. Of all the characters, Monica Geller, played by Courteney Cox, stands out as one of the most complex and layered.

‘FRIENDS’ presents Monica with various quirks defining her personality, from her infamous cleaning obsession to her overbearing competitiveness. A recent fan discussion on Reddit looks into the roots of Monica’s competitive streak, hypothesizing that it may be the product of her challenging upbringing.

Monica’s Traits: More than Meets the Eye

Monica’s zealous need to win in every circumstance, no matter how trivial, is a significant part of her character, often causes amusement. While many take it lightly, some fans have started contemplating its roots. They believe it could stem from her relationship with her brother Ross and their parents.

In the Geller household, Monica was always perceived as the less favored child, adding layers to her character. Constant comparisons and judgments from her parents instigated an inherent desire in her to win approval.

The Gellers: Ross vs. Monica

Monica always strived to outshine her brother Ross since their parents seemed to prefer him. This unhealthy competition, which became a quest for parental acceptance, permeated into her personality. Her obsession with winning competitions emerged as a validation of herself, proving her worth not only to her parents but also herself.

As a child competing for her parents’ attention and love, the urge of winning — even in something as simple as a sports match — became symbolic of self-validation and contentment. This became a coping mechanism, a way of proving to herself and her parents that she too could excel.

Summing Up

The sitcom ‘FRIENDS’ is recognized for its light-hearted comedy, yet it subtly addresses deeper issues with its multi-dimensional characters. The intense competitiveness of Monica Geller, often seen as a quirk, may have been developed due to her struggle for recognition and acceptance in her own family.

Although it may appear as a trivial desire to win, it’s much more for Monica. It functions as an emblem of self-validation and a means to achieve the approval that eluded her in her childhood. ‘FRIENDS’ is available for streaming on Netflix, giving fans a chance to reconnect with beloved characters and explore their complexities anew. With Monica’s competitive streak now spotlighted, fans may view her character in a new light.

In the end, ‘FRIENDS’ isn’t merely a comedy sitcom; it’s a portrayal of complex human emotions and personal histories intertwined within the humor and camaraderie. Every character has their own tale to tell, and Monica Geller’s story is layered with highs and lows that undoubtedly contributed to her competitive spirit.

Key Takeaways:

– Rain Man was a commercial and critical successes, securing four Oscars.
– Dustin Hoffman bagged the Best Actor award for his portrayal of Raymond, an autistic savant.
– Hoffman revealed in an interview that he almost quit the role as he doubted his ability to perform the character justly.
– The breakthrough moment for Hoffman happened during a scene where Raymond talks about how much he missed his underwear.

Hoffman’s Tough Journey to Raymond in Rain Man

One of the most impactful films in Hollywood, “Rain Man”, hit the movie theaters in 1988. This comedy-drama attracted many eyes, not just due to its wholesome storyline about two estranged brothers reconnecting following their father’s death, but also through the powerful performances by the film’s stars: Tom Cruise and Dustin Hoffman.

The movie was a monumental success, scooping up four Oscars, including a Best Actor nod for Hoffman, who effortlessly portrayed Raymond, an autistic savant.

Hoffman’s Struggles With His Character

Despite the film’s success and praise from audiences and critics alike, Hoffman’s journey to Raymond wasn’t easy. He admitted to struggling with the role, even considering walking away from the opportunity as he began doubting his ability to do justice to the character.

The actor spent a lot of time preparing for the role, researching extensively about autism through various resources including books and documentaries. He also capitalized on tapes of autistic individual, Peter Guthrie, provided by Guthrie’s brother, for inspiration.

Despite his efforts for the character, Hoffman confided to the Associated Press, “It was death” and “the worst work I had ever done”, reflecting his initial discontent with his performance.

And then came the turning point for Dustin Hoffman.

Hoffman’s Breakthrough Moment

The turning point occurred in a scene where Raymond and his brother were on a sweltering drive, and Raymond starts reminiscing about his underwear from Kmart. Hoffman’s improvisation during this scene played a pivotal role in helping him connect with his character.

The actor started improvising Raymond’s lines about his missing underwear, a move that director, Barry Levinson found impressively relatable to the character. This strategy helped Hoffman connect with Raymond’s obsession, leading to a breakthrough in his performance.

Hoffman reflected in his Associated Press interview, ” And I suddenly realized that I was playing off myself because I know something about obsession and I’m comfortable being obsessive.”

However, it wasn’t just the breakthrough that made the difference. Hoffman’s constant dedication and eventual realization of Larson’s obsessions and mannerisms, led the actor to deliver one of the best performances of his career. The actor indeed truly found Raymond, proving that hard work and dedication can triumph over self-doubt and fear.

Hoffman’s performance of Raymond is still highly celebrated for its powerful portrayal of an autistic savant, earning him his second Best Actor Oscar.

Rain Man’s Legacy

“Rain Man” continues to resonate with audiences three decades after its release. The film, available for streaming on Prime Video, showcases the importance of understanding and demonstrating the realities of individuals living with autism through the medium of cinema.

Hoffman’s candid tales of struggle and success demonstrate how even award-winning actors face moments of doubt and fear. It serves as a reminder of the effort and dedication that goes behind every memorable performance, and how sometimes, stepping out of the comfort zone brings forth amazing results.

The remarkable journey of Dustin Hoffman in becoming Raymond Babbitt in “Rain Man” succinctly sums up the sometimes arduous, yet ultimately rewarding process of diving deep into a character to bring it to life on the silver screen.