Key Takeaways:
– The newly unveiled trailer for Tim Burton’s Beetlejuice 2 incites excitement and critique among fans.
– Criticism centers on the perceivably low-quality visual effects, with some calling them worse than the original film.
– Michael Keaton and Tim Burton intentionally made the CGI look poor to bring a more handmade feel to the film.
– The authenticity behind this decision sparks a fresh debate on the use of technology in the film industry.
Tim Burton Unveils Beetlejuice 2 – Stirring Nostalgia and Debate
The much-anticipated trailer for Tim Burton’s Beetlejuice 2 is now available for viewing, injecting both excitement and critique among fans. The sequel brings back the original cast from the 1988 movie and promises to retain the charm of the initial film. However, the film’s reception hasn’t been unanimously positive, with critics scrutinizing the visual effects that appear visibly low quality.
Destined for Debate: Identifying The Questionably Low-Quality Visual Effects
Integral moments in the Beetlejuice 2 trailer reveal controversial visual effects. Those effects come under fire for looking somewhat dated, especially in a scene featuring a plane descending. Critics argue that the editing appears older than current industry standards, raising concerns about the CGI quality.
The criticism isn’t reserved solely for Beetlejuice 2; other recent releases, most notably some Marvel films, have faced heavy criticism for poor CGI. Critics argue that substandard special effects shatter the illusion of the film and ground the audience back into reality.
Despite criticism, some fans expressed anticipation for the film. One Twitter user, Riker, noted, “Movie looks great and I can’t wait to see it. That said like a lot of the newer movies, the CGI looks worse than the old stop motion/cgi of the first film.”
Intentionally Imperfect? Burton and Keaton’s Take on Beetlejuice 2’s CGI
Adding fuel to the fire is the revelation that Michael Keaton and Tim Burton purposefully embraced outdated CGI effects in Beetlejuice 2. Keaton explained in an interview with People that the pair was not interested in using excessive technology in creating the sequel. Their central aim was to evoke a handmade feel, aligning with the quirky essence of the original 1988 flick.
The discussion around the application of technology in the creation of films is a hot topic, where Keaton and Burton’s intentional ‘handmade feel’ has added a new perspective. Despite the backlash caused by the trailer’s CGI, it is important to consider their vision of keeping things seemingly low tech to maintain authenticity.
The reception to Beetlejuice 2’s trailer signals the enduring debate on the pros and cons of using high-end CGI. While it offers filmmakers the ability to depict breathtaking visuals and scenes, excessive reliance on it can often disappoint the audiences. With this in mind, the anticipated release of Beetlejuice 2 on September 5, 2024, might provide new insights on whether the traditional or modern take on filmmaking is more favorable.
Time will tell if the gamble taken by Keaton and Burton in creating a low-tech CGI for Beetlejuice 2 pays off. Until then, the debate on the role of technology in shaping the movie viewing experience will continue.
