The Film Industry’s Inclusion Crisis: A Dive into the 2023 USC Annenberg Inclusion Initiative Study
The film industry, despite its glitz and glamour, has long struggled with inclusivity and representation. A new study by the USC Annenberg Inclusion Initiative has shed light on just how dire the situation remains. According to the report, women and girls comprised only 30% of leading roles in the top major motion pictures of 2023. This figure marks a significant 14 percentage point decrease from the previous year, signaling a troubling regression.
Key Findings: Women and Girls on Screen
The study, which analyzed 1,700 movies and 5,084 speaking characters, revealed that only 32% of these characters were women or girls. This percentage is the lowest since the study began in 2007, indicating a persistent lack of progress in gender representation on screen. In stark contrast, 68.2% of speaking characters were male, and less than 1% were non-binary.
The decline in female representation isn’t limited to the screen alone. Behind the camera, the number of female directors, writers, composers, and producers showed no significant improvement from 2022. This stagnation underscores a broader systemic issue within the industry.
Gender Balance and Representation
One of the most startling revelations of the study is that only 11% of the top 100 movies of 2023 were gender-balanced, meaning women and girls occupied about half of all speaking roles. This figure is unchanged from 2007, highlighting a persistent imbalance that the industry has failed to address effectively.
Dr. Stacy L. Smith, head of the Annenberg Inclusion Initiative, summarized the findings succinctly: “No matter how you examine the data, 2023 was not the ‘Year of the Woman.’ We continue to report the same trends for girls and women on screen, year in and year out.” Dr. Smith’s comments point to a fundamental disregard for women as a significant audience demographic, coupled with an apparent reluctance to implement meaningful changes.
Underrepresented Groups in Film
The study also examined the representation of other marginalized groups. LGBTQ+ characters accounted for a mere 1.2% of all speaking roles in 2023’s top films, a number unchanged since 2014. Additionally, only 3% of leads or co-leads were aged 45 or older, and just 2.2% of speaking or named characters were depicted with a disability.
The exclusion of transgender characters was particularly stark. Across over 9,000 characters evaluated in 200 top movies from 2014 and 2023, not a single transgender character was given a speaking role or was named on screen.
Racial and Ethnic Representation
In terms of racial and ethnic diversity, there were no significant changes since 2007, though there was a notable shift in the percentage of white characters, which decreased from 78% to 56%. Meanwhile, the percentage of Asian characters saw a rise from 3% to 18%. Despite these changes, underrepresented racial/ethnic groups comprised 44% of characters, closely aligning with their representation in the U.S. population (41.1%).
However, many films still lack representation of certain racial and ethnic groups. For instance, 99 films had no American Indian/Alaska Native or Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander girls or women, and 81 films lacked a Middle Eastern/North African female character. Similarly, Hispanic/Latinas, Multiracial/Multiethnic, Asian, and Black/African American girls and women were also significantly underrepresented in many films.
The Call for Change
The study’s findings highlight a pressing need for the film industry to embrace inclusivity more earnestly. Dr. Smith emphasized that the formula for achieving inclusion hasn’t changed, and it’s imperative for industry executives and decision-makers to implement the proposed solutions. “Unless executives and other decision-makers listen and make different choices, we will not see different results,” she stated.
The resistance to change is compounded by broader societal forces, with U.S. state legislatures increasingly opposing Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) initiatives. This has left the entertainment industry in a precarious position, seemingly too apathetic or fearful to leverage its influence to reflect the real world accurately.
Conclusion
The 2023 USC Annenberg Inclusion Initiative study is a stark reminder of the persistent gender and diversity gaps in the film industry. The data underscores the urgent need for systemic change to ensure that all voices and stories are represented on screen and behind the scenes. As Dr. Smith suggests, the industry must act decisively to survive and thrive, reflecting the diverse world in which we live.
